The tin-foil hat brigade
Mood:  spacey
For anybody who's seen David in "A Little Bit of Soul", and thought the idea of highly-placed government, industry and finance leaders engaging in bizarre quasi-Satanic rituals was a little far-fetched: Try Googling "Bohemian Grove".

At the video store the other day, my eye fell on a copy of "Lord of the G-Strings -- The Femaleship of the String", mixed in with all the regular, non-adult movies. Here's the copy from the back of the DVD:

In the mythical realm of Diddle Earth, diminutive yet delectable Throbbit Bildo Saggins (Misty Mundae) is sent by Smirnoff the Wizard to destroy the legendary G-String - most powerful weapon in the land. The G-String was forged by the ancient villainess Horspank (Paige Richards), and those who possess the slinky and sexy under-garment experience supreme invincibility…and untold sensual pleasures.

Bildo is accompanied on her dangerous mission by fellow Throbbits Hornee (Darian Caine) and Spam (A.J. Khan) - both small of stature but big of erotic appetite. Together this courageous and curvaceous threesome trek far and wide throughout the territory of Diddle Earth, evading the Dorc forces of the evil wizard Sourasse and finding safety only in one another's arms. Along the treacherous path, Bildo and company also meet up with a fearless fighter - the dethroned Queen Araporn (Barbara Joyce) - who joins their quest to Party-Pooper Volcano, the only place where the G-String can be destroyed. Amidst rampaging desires and female fantasies made flesh, Bildo must be wary of Ballem, a hideous creature who desires the G-String and will stop at nothing in his mad quest to have it.

J.R.R. Bacchus presents a Terry M. West film, Lord of the G-Strings: Femaleship of the String - an epic erotic adventure pitting good against evil, small against big, beautiful against ugly and hot against 100% smokin'!

According to my sister, who saw a snippet of this soft-core parody on cable while staying at a hotel last year, mere words cannot do justice to the jaw-dropping badness of the film. She tried to describe it to me over the phone the next day, and all I could hear was the clunk of the receiver hitting the floor and faint sobbing gasps of laughter.

I'm almost tempted to rent it to see if it's as hilariously awful as the Ralph Bakshi version, but I don't want to have to keep fast-forwarding through all the naked women.

Theater etiquette
Mood:  incredulous
Three short but true stories about theater etiquette.....

Etiquette Story #1 - "Proof"

Once upon a time (last weekend to be exact), I bought a ticket for a screening of "Proof", a complex, cerebral, explosion-free movie about father and daughter math geniuses.

Shortly before the movie started, three teenage boys came slouching down the aisle and sat directly across from us. You know the type: humungous pants, backward baseball hats, size 17 feet, etc. I thought to myself, "How nice. These youth are interested in mathematics."

Boy, was I wrong. The second the lights dimmed, they began cat-calling and whistling. Kid #1 yelled "I'm scared!" over the credits, then punctuated each scene with one or two random screams. Kid #2 crinkled his candy bag loudly for several minutes until he was shushed. Kid #3 entertained the crowd with armpit farts. It was like a really irritating Cinema Paradiso. When the belching contest started, I went out to the lobby and found the manager.

The manager was quite understanding. Earlier that day, she'd had to remove a group of teenagers who'd been startling the people in front of them by reaching forward and grabbing their hair during the scary moments. She marched in with a flashlight, shone it in the kids' faces, and put the fear of God in them. Nary a peep or a rustle was heard for the rest of the movie. I was left to ponder whether they'd mistakenly wandered into the wrong theater, thinking they were going to see "Jarhead".

Let us now skip over the unpleasant part of this story, the part where we encounter the same kids in the street after the movie, who recognize me as the one who finked on them. Instead, let's move on to....

Etiquette Story #2 - "National Treasure"

This is a very short, and extremely pointless, story.

PrincessFaz, at a showing of "National Treasure", had the pleasure of watching kids in the front row throw gummy worms at the screen, one by one. The candy stuck to the bottom of the screen and stayed there for the rest of the film. During the snow scenes, there were all these fluorescent worms hanging, which ruined the cinematography.

There really isn't a moral to this, except to suggest that anybody under age 45 should be chaperoned at the movies.

Etiquette Story #3 - "Fahrenheit 911"

I went to see this two summers ago with a huge group of friends. The theater was packed, so we had to split up. Three of us ended up sitting near the back.

The moment the movie got going, my seat started jiggling. And jiggling. And jiggling. After a few minutes, I turned around and asked the guy behind me to please quit messing with the seat. He denied it vehemently.

I turned back to the movie. The jiggling started up again. I turned around, glared, and told him to cut it out. He said "It's not me, it's him!" (pointing at the guy next to him). The two of them started arguing with each other. I said "I don't care who's doing it, just please stop!"

I turned back to the movie. Again with the jiggling. Another heated kerfuffle and exchange of threats (this time accompanied by an angry chorus of "sshhhh"s from our neighbors).

By this point, I'd missed about 15 minutes of the film, and it was time to call in reinforcements. I leaned over to my friend Carmen, and whispered "Hey...is your seat jiggling?"

Carmen whispered back "No...is yours?"

"Yes," I said. "Those two idiots behind me claim they're not doing it. Then they wait till I turn around and start up again. I'm about ready to kill them."

There was a short pause. Carmen said "Okay, did the jiggling stop?"

"Yes..." I said. There was another short pause while horrified comprehension dawned. "You mean...was that....you?"

"Yeah. Sorry. I always jiggle my leg at the movies."



PS Yes, I apologized to the row behind me after it was over. Lavishly and abjectly.

The Thinking Woman's Crumpet
Mood:  lazy
As many of you know, David has been repeatedly been anointed "The Thinking Woman's Crumpet" by the press.

We decided to put this assertion to the test, by asking some highly accomplished female thinkers what they think of David:

ELEANOR ROOSEVELT, former First Lady of the US: "No one can make you feel swoony without your consent."

JANE AUSTEN, 19th-century British novelist: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a beautiful acting talent must be in want of 50,000,000 half-crazed, drooling fans."

MARIE CURIE, winner of the 1911 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her discovery of radium: "Ah! Zees Dahveed, 'ee is....'ow you say?...magnifique! 'Ee meks me glow lahk uranium!"

JANE GOODALL, renowned primatologist and conservationist, and world's foremost authority on chimpanzees: "David is highly intelligent, social, co-operative, and shares 99.99% of his genetic material with humanity. Paradoxically, the less he emulates alpha-male behavior, the more females he attracts."

DOROTHY PARKER, American writer, poet, and wit: "They sicken of Brad Pitt, who know David Wenham."

SUSAN B. ANTHONY, American civil rights leader and suffrage advocate: "Squeeeeeeee!"

This morning, I spotted a discarded Coconut air freshener lying on the sidewalk. A desiccated air freshener, no less. Was it a sign from the deities?

Amazon delivered '300' unto my mailbox Saturday, so I sat down and had a gander to see what we can expect from David's current project. In a word, yikes. Frank Miller's ink-and-testosterone illustrations depict a brutal, stark, cold world where life is cheap and the only real currency is Honor and Glory. Weakness is not just discouraged, it's beaten with a stick and tossed off a cliff. Sentimentality is for losers. The soldiers march through a desolate, rocky landscape with no food and little rest. Women barely register on the radar, except as chattel. This is going to be the most un-"chick flick" movie ever committed to film.

The filmmakers plan to stick closely to the novel and film it virtually panel-for-panel. They'll have to pad out the script a bit for the story to support the weight of a feature film. Judging from the casting calls for Gerry Butler lookalikes at various ages, we can guess that Leonidas' childhood will be fleshed out beyond the wolf episode. (By the way, are there many 3 - 5 year olds with martial arts experience? The place where I take karate requires a minimum age of 6).

The story is narrated in the first person plural, as though it were being told collectively by the 300. This "we" voice is used to great effect - it emphasizes how closely bonded the 300 were as a unit, and it effectively conveys an us-against-the-world sense of doom. The writing style is clipped, bare, and Hemingway-esque. The sentences. Are short. And sometimes repeated.

And sometimes repeated.

One thing I don't understand is the comic book convention of putting random dialogue words in boldface. It sounds oddly stilted. Will the movie characters be expected to speak that way as well?

Going 'cold lembas'
One movie I'm looking forward to seeing is "Little Fish", starring Galadriel (Cate Blanchett) and Elrond (Hugo Weaving) as recovering drug addicts:

Algebra 101
Phantasmagoria recently found the following posting on Technocratic's Xanga blog:

*****

Let Rodrigo Santoro = (hot).
Let David Wenham = (hot) (Faramir).
Let Dominic West = (badass).
Let Gerard Butler = (hot) (badass).

300 = [ ( Rodrigo Santoro + Dominic West + David Wenham + Gerard Butler ) x (Frank Miller) x (What I assume will be copious amounts of naked) ] ^ (Thermopylae)

Which can be reduced to:

300 = ARE THEY TRYING TO KILL ME WITH THE WAIT, AND WITH THE MEN?
= WHY DID PRODUCTION ON THIS ONLY BEGIN YESTERDAY?
= HOLY ****, I AM SO EXCITEDER.

*****

Well, you can't argue with the math.

Posted by dessicatedcoconut at 10:16 AM EST

Updated: November 4, 2005 2:53 PM EST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

It's....the perfect storm!
Mood:  accident prone
I'm too lazy to actually go and dig up this interview, but somewhere awhile back, David Wenham mentioned that he almost didn't survive a viewing of "The Perfect Storm".

I bring this up today because we've got a repeat performance going on outside. Hurricane Wilma and Tropical Storm Alpha have combined with another storm from the west to bring us 60+mph gusts and lashing sheets of rain along the coast. Snow is predicted tonight for the mountains.

When I saw "The Perfect Storm" in the theater, my friend kept quietly predicting each line seconds before they were uttered. For example, some meteorologist might be droning on in a long rambling monologue. As he paused, my friend would whisper gravely, "It's....the Perfect Storm", moments before the meteorologist said the exact same thing. After nearly an hour of this, my stomach hurt from holding in the laughter and I had to beg her to stop.

Quote from boyfriend: "My primary enjoyment of the film was watching George Clooney drown."

For me, the most unforgivable sin was the Boston Brahmin "pahk your cah" accents. Mark Wahlberg should know better. He's from Dorchester, for crying out loud.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled weather.

Books books books
Mood:  caffeinated

Today, I dreamt that I was given $1000 by a benevolent, book-worshipping deity, and commanded to spend it as fast as possible at Amazon.com. Not one to upset the gods, I spent part of lunch hour creating a 5-mile long wish list.

A good chunk of this hypothetical money went into the pockets of Andy Goldsworthy.

He creates mesmerizing earth art out of leaves, grass, feathers, raw sheep's wool, sticks, icicles, and pebbles, then photographs it. Circles, serpentine shapes, and spirals figure prominently. His pieces are simply breathtaking. For example:







And:






Photographs of his ephemeral art have been compiled into a series of beautiful, but pricey, coffee table books: "Wall", "Wood", "Stone", "Arches", "Time", etc.

Another portion of my invisible $1000 was spent on Dust and Van Helsing.

Six Degrees of David Wenham
Mood:  a-ok

Okay, you all know the party game, "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon". Somebody names an actor, then you have to link them to Kevin Bacon via other actors who've appeared in films together. It's based on that Stanley Milgram study from the 1950s, where he found that it takes an average of six people to link any two people in the world together.

So, for anybody reading this blog, odds are you can link yourself to David Wenham via six or fewer intermediaries. Even if you live on a remote Pacific atoll that gets visited by a mail ship once every five years.

Not too long ago, I was startled to discover that my degree of separation from David is one person. The link is Glenn Murcutt, who appeared in the film "Inside the Mind of the Architect", narrated by David. Back in 1993, at architecture school, Mr. Murcutt was our visiting studio professor. His work is utterly original and fascinating - he builds houses you could actually picture yourself living in. He uses simple building materials (recycled timber, corrugated steel), with linear forms and moveable shades designed to capture sunlight and allow for maximum windflow. His design motto (borrowed from the Aborigines) is "Touch the earth lightly", so his houses often perch on stilts and wind through existing trees. Tres cool.

Okay, so it probably doesn't count as a genuine Kevin Bacon link if David and Glenn didn't interact in the film. But, that's about as good as it gets.

Unless maybe when my cousins lived in Sydney during the 1980s, they had some random connection to David. But let's assume they didn't. It's a big city. I used to play roller hockey with this girl from New Zealand, and it drove her crazy whenever anybody said "You're from New Zealand? Hey, do you know Mary?"

The mathematics of "The Bank"
Mood:  lazy
Now Playing: Third base
Does the math in "The Bank" have any basis in the real world? Or does Jim Doyle ruin tablecloths for no good reason?

Jim's theories have their roots in the work of Paul Nelson Eliott, who first noticed nearly a century ago that, in between the peaks and troughs, stock market price fluctuations tend to come in clusters. Strangely enough, those clusters generally correspond to Fibonacci numbers - 3 waves on the way up, 2 on the way down. On smaller and smaller time scales, the larger peaks show clusters of mini-peaks corresponding to higher values in the Fibonacci sequence (21 and 34, or 55 and 89).

Benoit Mandelbrot, father of chaos theory, expanded upon this phenomenon of "self-similarity" - the idea that at any time scale, a stock market graph tends to look the same. If you put a 10-year graph and a 1-day graph side by side, without a horizontal scale, it's difficult to tell which is which. In nature, coastlines, craters, and clouds exhibit the same phenomenon. Like Eliott, Mandelbrot also noticed that violent price swings tend to occur in clusters. If a stock moves by 10% on one day, chances are good that it will have another large price change the following day.

The general consensus is that Mandelbrot's fractal equations are great at describing the behavior of the stock market, but lousy at predicting it. (Otherwise, we'd all be millionaires.) His chief contribution to financial theory was in demonstrating that price swings don't operate on an independent, normal bell curve; and that markets are far more risky and turbulent than previously thought. Prices do not move by chance; they react to themselves and to events outside the market.

My guess is that Jim's tablecloth equations were all horseflop, and that he secretly hacked into CentaBank's financial data server and cooked the market returns. For one thing, a real computer genius wouldn't waste processing power generating pretty grahics of Mandelbrot sets.

For another thing, he would also know enough to send faxes face down.